Concepts/Definition

ADPS Agent Systems · Engineering Concept

Dual-Scale Governance

Govern the current action and the long-running goal at the same time.

Application context: every action can be legal while the job drifts

A long-running research agent may lawfully read files, search, and edit drafts. Every local check passes. Dozens of turns later, most effort has moved to incidental terminology and formatting while the promised deliverable has not advanced. No action exceeded authority; the goal still drifted.

Definition

Dual-Scale Governance runs two checks:

  • Action scale checks the current tool, arguments, identity, resource scope, quota, and preconditions;
  • Goal scale compares the original goal, current plan, completed artifacts, remaining risk, and external outcome.

The action scale stops one dangerous call. The goal scale stops many locally plausible steps from accumulating into directional drift.

Engineering use

Runtime events carry both an action_id and a goal_contract_id. Every call passes action policy. At milestones, cost thresholds, or time windows, the runtime reviews progress against the goal contract. Missing progress, invalidated assumptions, or cost divergence causes pause, replanning, or human takeover rather than another local patch.

Boundary

Short transactions often need only action governance. Work that crosses hours, sessions, people, or systems needs the goal scale. Review frequency should follow risk and irreversibility; a full global review on every step would be unnecessarily expensive.

Proposal and provenance

Initial source within ADPS
First proposed within ADPS by Jia Huang
ADPS editorial work
ADPS separates per-action compliance from long-horizon goal drift as two concurrent governance scales.
Current standing
Cross-module governance concept

Chronicle

Recorded source
ADPS public page
First published on ADPS

View in the ADPS Chronicle