Concepts/Definition
ADPS Agent Systems · Engineering Concept
Dual-Scale Governance
Govern the current action and the long-running goal at the same time.
Application context: every action can be legal while the job drifts
A long-running research agent may lawfully read files, search, and edit drafts. Every local check passes. Dozens of turns later, most effort has moved to incidental terminology and formatting while the promised deliverable has not advanced. No action exceeded authority; the goal still drifted.
Definition
Dual-Scale Governance runs two checks:
- Action scale checks the current tool, arguments, identity, resource scope, quota, and preconditions;
- Goal scale compares the original goal, current plan, completed artifacts, remaining risk, and external outcome.
The action scale stops one dangerous call. The goal scale stops many locally plausible steps from accumulating into directional drift.
Engineering use
Runtime events carry both an action_id and a goal_contract_id. Every call passes action policy. At milestones, cost thresholds, or time windows, the runtime reviews progress against the goal contract. Missing progress, invalidated assumptions, or cost divergence causes pause, replanning, or human takeover rather than another local patch.
Boundary
Short transactions often need only action governance. Work that crosses hours, sessions, people, or systems needs the goal scale. Review frequency should follow risk and irreversibility; a full global review on every step would be unnecessarily expensive.
Proposal and provenance
- Initial source within ADPS
- First proposed within ADPS by Jia Huang
- First recorded in
- First Governance workshop, 18 August 2026
- ADPS editorial work
- ADPS separates per-action compliance from long-horizon goal drift as two concurrent governance scales.
- Current standing
- Cross-module governance concept
Chronicle
- Recorded source
- ADPS public page
- First published on ADPS